In March 2016, the American Heart Association warned that the overuse of energy drinks could cause increased heart problems including heart attacks, sudden cardiac arrest and other potentially life-threatening complications.Īnother study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in November 2015, found that consuming just one can of Rockstar energy drink led to an increased risk of heart problems and high blood pressure among young, healthy adults.

Those changes were not seen in caffeine drinkers. The effects could result in fainting, seizures and even sudden death, the researchers warned.Ī study published in April 2017 in the Journal of the American Heart Association indicated that those who consumed energy drinks experienced abnormal heart rhythms and prolonged elevated blood pressure, saying that the risks of energy drinks were different than just consuming caffeine alone.Īccording to the findings, two hours after consuming the drinks, those who were given the energy drink showed changes in the QT intervals of the heart, which affects the heart’s rhythm. In March 2017, a study conduced by Australian researchers linked caffeinated energy drinks to heart problems that can cause rapid, irregular heartbeats in some consumers. Energy Drink Health ConcernsĪlthough products like Monster Energy, Red Bull, Rockstar and other beverages have become very popular among teens and young adults in recent years, a number of studies have found that consumption of only a couple energy drinks over a several week period can cause increased blood pressure and heart arrhythmia, which can cause long-term heart problems. Many are labeled as dietary supplements, which means they do not have to provide a nutritional label or ingredient list. The lawsuit comes at a time of heightened concern over the safety of energy drinks and an ongoing debate about whether companies should be forced to reveal their ingredients. The class action lawsuit presents claims that Bang energy drinks violate California’s unfair competition law, the state’s false advertising laws, and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and also includes claims of breach of warranty, and breach of express warranty. The Bang energy drink lawsuit indicates that neither the plaintiff nor the other class members would have purchased, or paid as much for, the products had they known they did not contain the ingredients claimed in ads and on the cans themselves. “Plaintiff and Class Members were, in fact, misled by Defendant’s representations regarding the true nature of the Products’ ingredients, efficacy, and value.”

“Plaintiff and the Classes purchased and consumed the Products because they believed, based on the misleading product label and the information on Defendant’s website, and identical misleading information listed on and other retailers’ websites that the Products contained the ingredients stated on the Products’ labeling and moreover that the Products contained them in dosages that were ‘POTENT’ as claimed both on the front of the Products’ label, as well as on the back,” the lawsuit states. 09 grams of one branched chain amino acid Leucine. The same testing found absolutely no Coenzyme Q10, and only. However, Madison’s lawsuit indicates that testing commissioned by his attorney revealed that there was no creatine to be found in Bang.

Reign energy drink creatine